IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i11p1739-1748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of professional identity: the case of osteopathic medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Katherine

Abstract

The osteopathic medical profession was founded in the late 19th century and has become an accepted part of the medical establishment in the United States. Throughout its history, the osteopathic medical profession has attempted to define itself in a way that differentiates osteopathy from other alternative therapies and situates the profession as responsive to the changing health care needs of the American public. This article examines identity within the osteopathic profession by examining the ways in which the profession has created, maintained, and changed its identity in its over century-long existence. The case analysis presented here involves the examination of identity statements culled from several osteopathic data sources. The identity statements represent four specific time periods within the osteopathic profession: the founding statements of A. T. Still, statements from 1915 through 1935 when the scope of osteopathic identity was expanding, statements from 1954 through 1974 in which the osteopathic profession dealt with internal and external threats in developing a "separate but equal" identity, and recent statements from a osteopathic student web site that illustrate current and future views of osteopathic identity. The results of this case analysis highlight the role of the social environment in establishing and changing professional identity, the importance of an occupational founder in shaping the articulation of identity, and the tension between identity and practice within the osteopathic medical profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Katherine, 1998. "The evolution of professional identity: the case of osteopathic medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(11), pages 1739-1748, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:11:p:1739-1748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00247-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:11:p:1739-1748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.