IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i10p1619-1625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics of resource allocation in developing countries: The case of Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Jayasinghe, K. S. A.
  • De Silva, D.
  • Mendis, N.
  • Lie, R. K.

Abstract

The issues of prioritization of health care services and allocation of resources have recently received increasing attention and discussion. Several reports have been published by governments in different countries and the issues are discussed in many recent books and papers. In this paper the focus is on the problems faced by a developing country when allocation of health care resources is considered. We consider these issues under three headings and exemplify the situation in a developing country by taking Sri Lanka as an example. Firstly the evidence to formulate an ethical basis for the existing health care system in Sri Lanka is discussed, in particular the problem of defining a minimum quality of health care for the population. Secondly, we consider the issues which arise when we want to formulate the ethical basis for health sector reform. In particular, we examine current World Bank proposals. We shall argue that there are a number of important conceptual and ethical issues that have not been properly addressed in the various policy documents. Finally, we introduce our own alternative ethical framework for policy reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayasinghe, K. S. A. & De Silva, D. & Mendis, N. & Lie, R. K., 1998. "Ethics of resource allocation in developing countries: The case of Sri Lanka," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1619-1625, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:10:p:1619-1625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00110-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:10:p:1619-1625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.