IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46yi4-5p591-597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-rated health and self-assessed change in health in elderly men and women -- A five-year longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Leinonen, Raija
  • Heikkinen, Eino
  • Jylhä, Marja

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was two fold: (1) to examine how men and women self-rate their health as they age from 75 to 80 yr and how they assess the change in their health over the five year period; and (2) to ascertain how self-assessed change in health over the follow-up period corresponded to the difference in self-ratings of health between the assessments performed at baseline and at follow-up. The study was part of the Evergreen-project with the study group comprising all inhabitants born in 1914 (N = 388) living in Jyväskylä, central Finland. At baseline, 93.4%, and at follow-up, 93.3%, of those who were eligible participated in the interview. Self-rated health, when asked using the same questions, did not change at follow-up compared to baseline. However, nearly half of the follow-up group reported that their health had become worse over the five year period. Gender differences in self-rated health were not found, although women reported more often than men that their health had become worse and some of the men said their health had become better. It is concluded that self-rated health seems to be age-adjusted; elderly people who say their health has become worse as they age actually self-rate their health as the same or better than before.

Suggested Citation

  • Leinonen, Raija & Heikkinen, Eino & Jylhä, Marja, 0. "Self-rated health and self-assessed change in health in elderly men and women -- A five-year longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 591-597, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y::i:4-5:p:591-597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00205-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Case & Christina Paxson, 2005. "Sex differences in morbidity and mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 42(2), pages 189-214, May.
    2. Vie, Tina Løkke & Hufthammer, Karl Ove & Holmen, Turid Lingaas & Meland, Eivind & Breidablik, Hans Johan, 2014. "Is self-rated health a stable and predictive factor for allostatic load in early adulthood? Findings from the Nord Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y::i:4-5:p:591-597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.