IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46y1998i12p1613-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician administrators and the reorganization of federally sponsored treatment research for AIDS

Author

Listed:
  • Mueller, Mary-Rose

Abstract

Scholars of modern medicine are concerned with the implications of the movement of physicians into "elite" administrative positions in medical practice settings. To date, empirical studies of physician administrators have focused on their response to disputes that arise between medical and non-medical groups. This paper uses the case of federally funded treatment research for AIDS in the United States to explore the actions of physician administrators and the implications of those actions, in resolving intra-professional conflict. The findings suggest that the actions of elite physician administrators sometimes serve to enhance the fortunes of medical professionals. The findings further suggest that the actions of elite physician administrators sometimes serve to reproduce and affirm professional status distinctions that exist within the broader context of health delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Mueller, Mary-Rose, 1998. "Physician administrators and the reorganization of federally sponsored treatment research for AIDS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(12), pages 1613-1622, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:12:p:1613-1622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)10135-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:12:p:1613-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.