IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i5p773-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social support as conversation: Analysing breast cancer patients' interactions with their partners

Author

Listed:
  • Pistrang, Nancy
  • Barker, Chris
  • Rutter, Christine

Abstract

This paper demonstrates an alternative approach to studying the process of social support in close relationships by examining three tape-recorded conversations between breast cancer patients and their partners. We argue that existing research fails to take account of the "social" aspects of social support, and that new methods, sensitive to the complexities of human interaction, are needed. One promising method, tape-assisted recall (in which an audiotape of an interaction is played back to participants), allows researchers to examine the help-intended communication within a dyad as well as each participant's view of that communication. The conversations of the three couples and the participants' moment-by-moment perceptions of these conversations illustrate the complexities of help-intended communication. The commentaries in the tape-assisted recall sessions yielded insights into the interactions that were not always apparent on the surface: the personal meanings of the interactions, in the context of the couple's relationship, were necessary for understanding how support attempts are delivered effectively and why they sometimes fail. The strengths and limitations of the method for the study of social support are discussed. Implications for community health interventions to optimize support for couples coping with illness are also addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pistrang, Nancy & Barker, Chris & Rutter, Christine, 1997. "Social support as conversation: Analysing breast cancer patients' interactions with their partners," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 773-782, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:5:p:773-782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00413-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:5:p:773-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.