IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i2p295-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Head injury rehabilitation in the U.K.: An economic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • McGregor, K.
  • Pentland, B.

Abstract

The human and societal costs as a result of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are extensive with approximately 200-300/100000 of the population requiring hospitalisation each year in the U.K. Advances in neurosurgical management have meant that more people sustaining head injuries are surviving. The need for rehabilitation programmes for these individuals is therefore ever increasing. While in the U.S.A. rehabilitation programmes for TBI patients are well established, in the U.K. the provision of such services is patchy and varies widely in different localities. The belated response to the rehabilitation needs of this group of individuals in the U.K. has coincided with an increased awareness of the economic efficiency of health care provision. This paper critically reviews published studies looking at the economics of rehabilitation services for brain injured patients. No studies in the U.K. were identified and all the sources discussed are from the U.S.A. The methodological guidelines underlying economic appraisal of health care are summarised and the studies assessed to determine the extent to which they fulfil these guidelines. The paper concludes that most studies purporting to provide evidence of cost-effectiveness did not include appropriate data, nor followed the methodological guidelines allowing such claims to be made. Some recommendations for future research are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • McGregor, K. & Pentland, B., 1997. "Head injury rehabilitation in the U.K.: An economic perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 295-303, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:295-303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00345-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:295-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.