IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i2p283-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cleaning the womb: Constructions of cervical screening and womb cancer among rural Black women in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Wood, Katharine
  • Jewkes, Rachel
  • Abrahams, Naeemah

Abstract

In South Africa problems with current cervical screening uptake, including low coverage and loss of screened women to follow-up, have been identified. This paper presents the findings of an anthropological study of rural Black women's perceptions and understandings of cervical symptomatology, screening and cancer conducted among three different language groups in South Africa. The data collected indicate that women were screened when presenting with symptoms of reproductive tract infection, with the result that for many the smear came to be associated with the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). In some cases the smear was said itself to "clean" the womb. The results were often interpreted by women as signifying womb "dirtiness" and confirming the presence of symptomatic reproductive disease for which they had initially presented to the biomedical facility. Several barriers to screening were identified including fear of vaginal exposure, expectation of pain, being asymptomatic, and gender of the practitioner. In addition women perceived womb cancer to be invariably terminal, knowledge which was constructed from personal and community experience of the illness. The illness was closely associated with (usually female) "promiscuity". The authors discuss the implications of the data for healthworkers and health promotion specialists, in particular the association of the smear with STDs, the way in which women are recruited for screening, the perceived terminality of womb cancer, and the processes by which local knowledge about illness is constructed. The findings demonstrate the importance of medical anthropology in contributing towards the provision of effective and locally appropriate healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Wood, Katharine & Jewkes, Rachel & Abrahams, Naeemah, 1997. "Cleaning the womb: Constructions of cervical screening and womb cancer among rural Black women in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 283-294, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:283-294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00344-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wray, Natalie & Markovic, Milica & Manderson, Lenore, 2007. "Discourses of normality and difference: Responses to diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological cancer of Australian women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 2260-2271, June.
    2. Markovic, Milica & Kesic, Vesna & Topic, Lidija & Matejic, Bojana, 2005. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study with women in Serbia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2528-2535, December.
    3. White, Heather L. & Mulambia, Chishimba & Sinkala, Moses & Mwanahamuntu, Mulindi H. & Parham, Groesbeck P. & Moneyham, Linda & Grimley, Diane M. & Chamot, Eric, 2012. "‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1486-1493.
    4. Dunn, Richard A. & Tan, Andrew K.G., 2010. "Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: Are targeted interventions necessary?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1089-1093, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:283-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.