IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Essential obstetric care: Assessment and determinants of quality


  • Adeyi, Olusoji
  • Morrow, Richard


This paper reports on a study to develop and to apply methods for measuring the quality of essential obstetric care (EOC) in health centers. Based on a Nigerian guideline and an international guideline, and in consultation with local experts in primary care obstetrics, norms were established for equipment, personnel, supplies and the process of EOC, focusing on critical tasks. A combination of assessment methods was used, including observation of tasks performed during intrapartum care; use of data from records of care kept by midwives during the period of observation; use of data from records kept by midwives in the calendar year preceding the period of observation; exit interviews with clients; and inventories of equipment and supplies. Twelve health centers in three Local Government Areas (LGAs) and 360 clients in labor were included in the study. Quality of care was measured quantitatively as a score, calculated for each task and for each delivery in the health center. The results show that the methods developed are useful for: identifying quality score differences among health centers, and the effects of methods of assessment on quality scores; identifying aspects of EOC requiring improvements within each health center; and identifying factors influencing the quality of care, as a basis for effective quality improvement efforts. Regression models show that the most consistent and important predictor of quality scores is the use of printed forms (i.e. routine records of labor) during intrapartum care. Printed forms served as job aids, providing prompts that reminded midwives to perform specific tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeyi, Olusoji & Morrow, Richard, 1997. "Essential obstetric care: Assessment and determinants of quality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1631-1639, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1631-1639

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1631-1639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.