IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i10p1581-1587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex differences in prescribed medications: Another case of discrimination in general practice

Author

Listed:
  • Sayer, Geoffrey P.
  • Britt, Helena

Abstract

Biological, social and behavioural factors influence doctors to prescribe different types of medications to male and female patients. Secondary analysis of data from the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990-1991 was conducted using multiple logistic regression to discriminate male and female patient encounters in general practice. The approach used considered possible confounding influences of GP and patient characteristics. The results showed that females were significantly more likely than males to receive prescriptions for: antibiotics; hormones; drugs affecting the central nervous, cardiovascular and urogenital systems; drugs for allergy and immune disorders; ear and nose topical preparations, and skin preparations, even after taking into account morbidity differences. If males and females were treated according to their presenting problems, differences in morbidity patterns would account for the management differences. However, the present investigation would suggest that GP and patient behaviours are also important factors that lead to differences in the prescriptions received by male and female patients in general practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayer, Geoffrey P. & Britt, Helena, 1997. "Sex differences in prescribed medications: Another case of discrimination in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1581-1587, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:10:p:1581-1587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00095-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:10:p:1581-1587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.