IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v44y1997i8p1107-1114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prenatal biopsychosocial risk assessment and low birthweight

Author

Listed:
  • Herrera, Julian A.
  • Salmerón, Bertha
  • Hurtado, Hugo

Abstract

A double-blind prospective study was conducted to compare the predictive value of a prenatal biomedical risk scale (PBRS) and a prenatal biopsychosocial risk assessment (PBRAS) with respect to low birthweight. All obstetric patients at seven health centers located in Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, and Uruguay from November 1992 through January 1994 whose initial prenatal visits occurred between the 14th and 28th week of gestation were invited to participate. Information was obtained on 979 mother-infant pairs. High PBRS scores showed sensitivity of 62.1% and specificity of 81.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.5%, with respect to low birthweight. With the addition of the psychosocial factors (PBRAS), sensitivity of 75.7% and specificity of 76.1%, PPV of 55.1% and NPV of 88.9% were observed. The prospective cohort design of this study provides a strong basis for conclusion that an evaluation of the prenatal biopsychosocial risk (as operationalized by the PBRAS) adjusted for other variables such as length of gestation, neonatal APGAR, perinatal mortality, socioeconomic status, drinking and smoking improves the positive predictive value of the assessment of women who may give birth to newborns with low birthweight (P

Suggested Citation

  • Herrera, Julian A. & Salmerón, Bertha & Hurtado, Hugo, 1997. "Prenatal biopsychosocial risk assessment and low birthweight," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1107-1114, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:8:p:1107-1114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00240-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:8:p:1107-1114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.