IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i6p903-917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of health and treatment perceptions on the use of prescribed medication and home remedies among African American and white American hypertensives

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Carolyn M.
  • Segal, Richard

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between health beliefs and the use of both prescribed medication and home remedies among a group of African American and White American hypertensives. Data were collected via telephone interviews with 300 individuals who had been medically diagnosed as having hypertension and had been prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication. Using the health belief model (HBM) as the theoretical framework, 4 primary hypotheses involving the perceptions of severity, susceptibility, benefits and costs of each treatment and compliance with prescribed mediation (Rx) and use of home remedies (HR) were tested. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that age, costs of Rx and benefits of HR predicted compliance with Rx. The primary predictors of use of HR were ethnicity, poverty status, education, severity, benefits and costs of HR. The differences in predictor variables for each treatment behavior are discussed and speculations about the nature and importance of these differences are offered. Study findings support the suggestion that patient beliefs about their disease and their evaluations of treatment options should be considered when developing therapeutic plans and when monitoring patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Carolyn M. & Segal, Richard, 1996. "The effects of health and treatment perceptions on the use of prescribed medication and home remedies among African American and white American hypertensives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 903-917, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:6:p:903-917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00434-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:6:p:903-917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.