IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v41y1995i12p1725-1729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do health service managers respond to qualitative research?

Author

Listed:
  • Van der Walt, Hester
  • Mathews, Catherine

Abstract

During 1992 a qualitative evaluation of a government health service-run community health worker (CHW) project in South Africa found that project workers were doing good work despite serious structural shortcomings related to lack of community participation and inadequate integration of the project in the health district system. Recommendations were made to develop the project in order to enhance community involvement, to build closer integration between the project and the services offered at the health centre, and to collaborate with non-government CHW projects in neighbouring areas. The evaluation study was followed up one year later by interviews with health managers to determine their response to the evaluation. The managers reported that they had found the qualitative data valuable for understanding how clients perceived the health service, and for planning a more community-responsive service. Despite this, the recommendations from the evaluation were not implemented and political developments in the district resulted in the CHW project being closed down. It is concluded that qualitative evaluators need to carefully explore the political context of primary health care interventions in order that their research provides useful data for decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Van der Walt, Hester & Mathews, Catherine, 1995. "How do health service managers respond to qualitative research?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(12), pages 1725-1729, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1725-1729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00133-R
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1725-1729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.