IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v41y1995i10p1339-1348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care--An application to asthma and diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Mccoll, E.
  • Steen, I. N.
  • Meadows, K. A.
  • Hutchinson, A.
  • Eccles, M. P.
  • Hewison, J.
  • Fowler, P.
  • Blades, S. M.

Abstract

Increasing emphasis is now being placed on the assessment of patient outcomes, both in evaluating medical interventions and in quality assurance initiatives. Clinicians, purchasers, managers and researchers need outcome measures that are valid, reliable and responsive. This paper describes the theory and practice underlying the development of outcome measures for two chronic conditions, asthma and diabetes, for application in ambulatory care settings. Existing generic and condition-specific health status and health-related quality-of-life measures were administered to almost 1300 patients. The psychometric properties of these measures were examined to identify those that were of adequate validity and reliability in these population groups. Step-wise regression procedures were then used to identify a core set of scales that best predicted patients' general health perceptions, which could be used in measuring general health outcomes for each of these groups. These core sets consist of up to 40 items, spanning physical function, energy and vitality, emotional well-being and condition-specific aspects of health such as symptom control. Further analysis is being carried out to assess the responsiveness to change of these core item sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mccoll, E. & Steen, I. N. & Meadows, K. A. & Hutchinson, A. & Eccles, M. P. & Hewison, J. & Fowler, P. & Blades, S. M., 1995. "Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care--An application to asthma and diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1339-1348, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:10:p:1339-1348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00120-V
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:10:p:1339-1348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.