IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i9p1193-1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contracting for palliative care

Author

Listed:
  • Clark, David
  • Neale, Brenda
  • Heather, Pauline

Abstract

In this paper the role of purchasing authorities, as set out in the current U.K. policy literature, is reviewed in the context of recent developments in palliative care. The notion of the purchasing cycle, from need assessment and strategic planning through to contracting and monitoring is outlined, along with core features of recent health and social care legislation in Britain: quality assurance, consumer choice and value for money. The role of providers and service users in the purchasing process is examined and the relationship between purchasers across the health/social care divide is explored. The implications of contracting for the voluntary sector provision of palliative care are also assessed. The review highlights the difficulties under the new legislation in reconciling the aim of efficiency with that of quality assurance, and of separating out the roles of purchasers and providers in a context where palliative care service developments have been provider-led. These factors reinforce the requirement to turn the purchaser-provider split into an effective partnership. Finally, the review highlights the need to address the current imbalances in the purchasing cycle by giving adequate attention to aggregate need assessment and strategic planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, David & Neale, Brenda & Heather, Pauline, 1995. "Contracting for palliative care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1193-1202, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:9:p:1193-1202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)00239-P
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:9:p:1193-1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.