Author
Abstract
Despite China's tiered healthcare system positioning primary care as the cornerstone of hypertension management, patients' bypassing of community clinics for hospital care reveals a hope gap as an unequal institutional capacity to cultivate the resources essential for sustained condition management that quality- and trust-based explanations leave unexamined. Drawing on abductive thematic analysis of 24 semi-structured interviews with hypertensive patients in Shenzhen, and guided by Gili & Mangone's sociology of hope, this study explores how hope is socially mediated through patient-provider interactions across care levels and how these experiences of hope influence treatment-seeking decisions. Findings reveal that community clinics typically generated fragile, contingent forms of hope due to perceived limitations in expertise and resources, leading some patients to delay or avoid care. Hospitals, by contrast, offered structured and anticipatory hope, albeit undermined by overcrowding and long waits, reinforcing patients' preference for hospital care. Patients navigated these hope differentials, investing time, money, and effort to secure hope as a resource for managing hypertension. By conceptualising hope as relational, socially embedded, and structurally produced, the study advances a sociological understanding of systemic inequities in healthcare access and utilisation. Addressing the hope gap, rather than solely redistributing clinical resources, may be key to strengthening primary care and alleviating hospital strain in China and comparable tiered systems.
Suggested Citation
Li, Bo, 2026.
"The hope gap: a qualitative analysis of tiered hypertension care in China,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626005174
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119441
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626005174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.