Author
Listed:
- Xu, Xinyi
- Wu, Chun-min
- Liu, Wei-Hong
- Cao, Juan
- Xu, Qin
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancer patients face significant dietary challenges, compounded in China by competing recommendations from Western clinical nutrition and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). As family caregivers increasingly turn to social media for guidance, the quality and nature of dietary content remains largely unexplored. This study employed multimodal critical discourse analysis to examine 370 posts on Xiaohongshu, a Chinese social media platform with over 200 million monthly active users. Analysis revealed a complex information ecology characterized by four patterns. First, family caregivers dominated the discourse, constructing “experiential authority” through accumulated practice while health professionals remained peripheral. Second, a “nutritional double bind” emerged from tensions between clinical nutrition and TCM dietary principles, with caregivers navigating contradictory guidance through selective adherence or syncretic formulations. Third, “aestheticized care labor” transformed everyday cooking into performative visual displays, establishing aspirational standards that may exclude caregivers with fewer resources. Fourth, “Trojan Horse marketing” characterized commercial accounts that appropriated authentic caregiving conventions to embed promotional content within seemingly personal narratives. These findings highlight that dietary discourse on social media is deeply entangled with cultural values, emotional labor, and economic interests, with implications for health communication, digital health literacy, and platform governance.
Suggested Citation
Xu, Xinyi & Wu, Chun-min & Liu, Wei-Hong & Cao, Juan & Xu, Qin, 2026.
"Care, commerce, and conflict: A multimodal discourse analysis of dietary guidance for gastrointestinal cancer survivors on Xiaohongshu,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004983
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119422
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.