Author
Listed:
- Ge, Haoxuan
- Wang, Jue
- Wu, Devin Yongzhao
- Zhou, Hanlin
Abstract
Physical Activity (PA) is known to buffer stress, yet evidence remains limited when examining real-time stress responses alongside objective measures of activity and environmental exposures in daily life. To address the gap, this study employs a Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) framework that integrates accelerometer, GPS tracking, and survey data. The primary objective of this study is to assess the association between self-reported psychological stress and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during the hours preceding GEMA prompts. Additionally, the study examines whether engaging in MVPA later in the day is associated with greater reductions in stress relative to morning baseline levels. Data were collected from 130 participants in the City of Mississauga, Ontario, over 7 days. Results revealed that higher levels of MVPA in the 5-h window preceding GEMA prompts were associated with significantly lower odds of reporting higher stress. On weekends, the stress-reduction effect was stronger after completing PA later in the day than on weekdays. Lower-income participants engaged in outdoor MVPA in environments perceived as safer, more beautiful, and greener compared to those of higher-income participants. Yet, no significant association was found between stress and environmental exposures, possibly because aggregated exposure measures were not sensitive enough to capture short-term changes in the daily context. The findings demonstrate the value of GEMA in capturing interactions among behaviour, environment, and health, and suggest that future research should apply more dynamic GEMA approaches to better assess short-term environmental exposures and stress.
Suggested Citation
Ge, Haoxuan & Wang, Jue & Wu, Devin Yongzhao & Zhou, Hanlin, 2026.
"Investigating the relationship between psychological stress and physical activity through individual-based geographic ecological momentary assessment,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004879
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119411
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.