IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v403y2026ics0277953626004594.html

Racial and gender disparities in patient-centered communication among older adults in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Onyango, Brenda

Abstract

Patient-centered communication is the foundation of patient-centered care (Iezzoni et al., 2012) and is strongly correlated with physical well-being and satisfaction with care (Fabbri et al., 2020; Schut, 2021). Prior studies on patient-centered communication lack consensus on how race and gender, two critical axes of social status and inequality, shape patient-centered communication (Palmer et al., 2014; Rogers et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2018; Trivedi et al., 2021). To analyze racial and gender disparities in patient-centered communication among older adults, I use data from the 2010 Health and Retirement Study and the 2011 Health Care Mail Survey to compare communication measures among racial groups and between men and women within each racial group. I examine patient-centered communication experiences of non-Hispanic Black/African American, non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic older men and women born in the United States using several models. The results demonstrate that there is an association between gender and race and patient-centered communication, with men having fewer experiences and Black respondents having more experiences of patient-centered communication after controlling for socioeconomic status, health, and healthcare access. To explain the racialized and gendered nature of medical communication, I integrate the theory of fundamental causes of health (Link and Phelan, 1995; Phelan and Link, 2015) with the relational theory of inequality (Tomaskovic-Devey, 2014).

Suggested Citation

  • Onyango, Brenda, 2026. "Racial and gender disparities in patient-centered communication among older adults in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626004594
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:403:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.