Author
Listed:
- Cha, Leah
- Moorehead, DaiJa
- McLaughlin, Katie A.
- Sumner, Jennifer A.
Abstract
Early life adversity (ELA) is associated with cardiometabolic risk over the lifespan. While cumulative risk models of ELA have provided insights into those most vulnerable, emerging evidence suggests that ELA dimensions of threat and deprivation have distinct consequences for neurodevelopment. However, these dimensions remain understudied in relation to cardiometabolic risk. We assessed associations between ELA—comparing cumulative risk and dimensional approaches—with a cardiometabolic risk composite in youth aged 9-19 (n=117). Using a multi-method approach, youth and caregivers reported on youths’ ELA experiences at baseline and 2-year follow-up visits; reports were aggregated to reflect lifetime experiences of threat and deprivation at follow-up. In addition to threat and deprivation composites, a cumulative ELA composite was calculated by summing the number of threat- and deprivation-related experiences. At follow-up, youth provided measures of blood pressure, body mass index, and waist circumference; indicators were standardized and summed. Regression models revealed that the cumulative ELA composite was not significantly associated with cardiometabolic risk. However, threat-related ELA, but not deprivation-related ELA, was associated with greater cardiometabolic risk, adjusting for age and sex. Furthermore, age moderated the deprivation-cardiometabolic risk association, such that greater deprivation was linked to lower cardiometabolic risk in late childhood/early adolescence, but not in middle or late adolescence. Results indicate that dimensional models of ELA may offer more nuanced understanding of biological embedding of adversity and its relevance for cardiometabolic risk, with stronger risk associations observed for threat-related experiences in youth.
Suggested Citation
Cha, Leah & Moorehead, DaiJa & McLaughlin, Katie A. & Sumner, Jennifer A., 2026.
"Early life adversity and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents: Comparison of dimensional and cumulative approaches to adversity,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 402(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:402:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004120
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119336
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:402:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.