IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v401y2026ics0277953626004442.html

Abortion information seeking: Engaged patients, stigma, and emotion work

Author

Listed:
  • Heymann, Orlaith
  • Gyuras, Hillary
  • Odum, Tamika
  • Bessett, Danielle

Abstract

Patients' experiences of obtaining information for stigmatized health concerns remain understudied. We examine abortion patients’ accounts of abortion information-seeking and the emotions they brought to or developed from that process. Drawing on 41 interviews with Ohio abortion patients, we find that information work, the labor of assembling and evaluating health information, involved emotion work. Abortion stigma intensified this emotion work. Consequently, participants engaged in different strategies to minimize this labor, including avoiding information when faced with stigma and misinformation. We argue that the current abortion information environment often burdens abortion seekers and that information-seeking may not always be beneficial in stigmatized health contexts. Our findings have implications for understanding patient engagement and avoidance in abortion care, with implications for how people seek and manage information in other emotional or politicized health contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Heymann, Orlaith & Gyuras, Hillary & Odum, Tamika & Bessett, Danielle, 2026. "Abortion information seeking: Engaged patients, stigma, and emotion work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004442
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626004442
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.