IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v401y2026ics0277953626004156.html

Who benefits, who is left behind? Intersectional inequities in unmet health care needs before and after the 2010 Swedish choice in primary health care reform using decision trees

Author

Listed:
  • Pedrós Barnils, Núria
  • Mosquera, Paola A.
  • Gustafsson, Per E.

Abstract

In 2010, Sweden implemented the Choice in Primary Health Care reform, allowing private healthcare providers to establish themselves at self-selected locations. While intended to improve efficiency and responsiveness through increased competition, concerns were also raised about its potential to reinforce inequities in healthcare access across different population groups. This study examines intersectional inequities in unmet healthcare needs (UHCN) in relation to the reform's implementation. Using data from the Health on Equal Terms survey (2007–2014, N = 69,644), we applied a decision tree-based analytical method (Model-Based Recursive Partitioning) combined with a post-hoc selection approach based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve to identify intersectional subgroups and assess reform-related effects. Although UHCN prevalence decreased by 11% after the reform, this overall improvement did not result in a narrowing of the equity gap across intersectional groups. Those born outside the Nordic countries, intersecting with low income, low education, and middle age, remained at the highest risk of experiencing UHCN both before (PR = 6.67, p < 0.001) and after (PR = 5.14, p < 0.001) the reform's implementation, indicating that, while absolute levels of UHCN decreased, the relative positioning of disadvantaged groups remained largely unchanged. These findings illustrate that overall improvements in healthcare access following market-oriented reforms do not necessarily address pre-existing structural inequities, and suggest that complementary equity-targeted measures will be required to ensure equitable access across diverse populations in Sweden. The decision tree-based approach proved valuable for evaluating health policies by uncovering heterogeneous effects across complex, intersectional patterns of healthcare outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedrós Barnils, Núria & Mosquera, Paola A. & Gustafsson, Per E., 2026. "Who benefits, who is left behind? Intersectional inequities in unmet health care needs before and after the 2010 Swedish choice in primary health care reform using decision trees," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626004156
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.