IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v401y2026ics0277953626004119.html

No evidence that anti-domestic violence laws reduce violent child discipline in sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Hanbo
  • Pesando, Luca Maria

Abstract

Albeit rarely recognized as such in existing legislation, violent child discipline is a clear form of domestic violence (DV) with enduring consequences for child well-being. This study merges household survey data from 27 sub-Saharan African countries with World Bank data on law implementation to investigate whether broad DV legislation introduced since the mid-2000s has curbed violent parenting practices. Using a quasi-experimental approach to compare childrearing practices and attitudes between countries with and without anti-DV laws, before and after law implementation, we document a robust increase in violent child discipline—mainly driven by emotional punishment—and a higher endorsement of harsh parenting practices following the introduction of these laws. These adverse effects are attenuated in countries with higher income inequality, where the laws appear to play more of a “protective” role. Our findings underscore the unintended consequences when anti-DV legislation is enacted without a specific target for child protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Hanbo & Pesando, Luca Maria, 2026. "No evidence that anti-domestic violence laws reduce violent child discipline in sub-Saharan Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626004119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626004119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.