IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v401y2026ics0277953626003345.html

Politeness strategies in doctor-patient communication on weight loss: Addressing face-threats in advice delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Bespala, Liliia
  • Meyerhoff, Miriam
  • Albury, Charlotte

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are encouraged to offer weight loss advice whenever appropriate to patients living with obesity in primary care. However, conversations on weight present interactional difficulties for both GPs and patients and hold the potential to reinforce weight stigma. Existing guidance offers little support on how clinicians can use language strategically to navigate the interactional difficulties of discussing weight opportunistically. This study examines how GPs manage the challenges of weight-loss advice delivery during routine consultations. Drawing on Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory and using discourse and conversation analysis of 185 audio-recorded GP–patient encounters, we show that clinicians employ both negative and positive politeness to enhance the acceptability of advice. Negative politeness strategies – such as agency mitigation, reducing the illocutionary force of the utterance, and point-of-view distancing – help soften criticism, avoid explicit allocation of blame, and protect autonomy when broaching the sensitive topic of weight. Positive politeness – attending to patients' interests and wants, exaggerating approval or interest, presupposing cooperation, and including both the speaker and the addressee in the projected activity – works to build rapport, support cooperation, and facilitate commitment to next steps. The use of positive politeness when suggesting further actions was associated with better patient uptake of advice and facilitated closing the sequence on a positive note. We argue that using politeness strategies in sequence – starting with negative politeness to broach the topic and moving to positive politeness when discussing next steps – allows GPs to navigate these sensitive conversations more smoothly. Strategic use of politeness has the potential to reduce the risk of reinforcing weight stigma in primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Bespala, Liliia & Meyerhoff, Miriam & Albury, Charlotte, 2026. "Politeness strategies in doctor-patient communication on weight loss: Addressing face-threats in advice delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626003345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.