Author
Abstract
Loneliness is linked to higher mortality and poorer health worldwide. As the global population of individuals who are unpartnered and childless grows, public health concerns about social isolation have risen. Sociological theories distinguish between having fewer ties, being socially isolated, and being lonely while gerontological theories emphasize how aging adults prioritize smaller, high-quality relationships. Yet, norms about family, friendship, and loneliness also differ by country contexts such as culture and development. Therefore, while close non-family ties (e.g., friendship) might reduce loneliness, particularly among those who lack partners or children, these processes likely differ across country contexts. Consequently, it remains unclear 1) whether lacking partners or children is associated with various dimensions of loneliness, 2) whether friendship buffers risk of loneliness, and 3) if and how these processes differ across societies. This study examines being unpartnered or childless, friend contact, and loneliness among those aged 45+ (N = 19,289) across 25 countries using data from the International Social Survey Programme (2017) and country-level indicators from the World Health Organization and World Values Survey. Being unpartnered is particularly associated with loneliness—especially lacking companionship. Yet, frequent friend contact likely buffers loneliness across all outcomes—especially for the unpartnered. Those in countries that place a high value on family and especially friendship are at lower risk of loneliness. These findings are discussed considering changing family structures, the potential role of friendship in compensating for limited family ties, and differential risks of loneliness by country context.
Suggested Citation
Mair, Christine A., 2026.
"Limited family ties, friendship, and contextual variation in loneliness risk across 25 countries,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003096
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119233
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.