IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v401y2026ics0277953626002613.html

Assessing multilevel association of genderism on cognitive health of older adults across mesosystems and microsystems using the longitudinal aging study in India: An adaptation of the ecological systems theory and cumulative disadvantage/advantage framework

Author

Listed:
  • Perianayagam, Arokiasamy
  • Dandona, Rakhi
  • Selvamani, Y.
  • Salvi, Supriya Kaustubh
  • Surpum, Snehaprabha
  • Albanese, Emiliano
  • Zanwar, Preeti Pushpalata

Abstract

Structural and social determinants across chronosystems critically shape educational transitions and cognitive aging in India by influencing cognitive reserve through life-course. Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory and the Cumulative Disadvantage/Advantage frameworks, we conceptualize genderism as a structural and social determinant of cognitive health operating across multiple ecological levels - national (macrosystem), regional/states (mesosystem), and household/family or individual (microsystem) – within India's chronosystem. Using Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI, 2017–2018), we assessed cognitive health across five domains, i.e., memory, orientation, attention, object naming, and executive function among older adults in 36 states and Union Territories of India. Three-level regression models examined how microsystem operating at individual (e.g., age, sex, education, childhood SES, widowhood, health behaviors), and household level (monthly per capita expenditure, indoor air quality, urban/rural residence), and mesosystem operating at state-level (e.g., women's education and employment rates) factors interact to shape cognitive health outcomes. Cognitive health outcomes showed wide gender gaps with regional sex disparities with the largest gap among those with education less than primary education (men: 24; women: 21) which reversed among those with post-secondary education (women: 33; men: 33). Widowed women and those with poor health indicators had significantly lower cognitive health scores. At the microsystem household-level, urban residence (β = 2.64), and households with cleaner cooking fuel use (β = 1.61) while at the mesosystem state-level, the % of women with at least primary education (β = 1.82) and the % of women who were employed (β = 0.62) were associated with improved cognitive health outcomes. The findings reveal how genderism across chronosystems accumulate over the life course highlighting the need for national-state-level policies that enhance women's access to education, employment, health, and nutrition to mitigate gendered disparities in late life cognitive health among Indian adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Perianayagam, Arokiasamy & Dandona, Rakhi & Selvamani, Y. & Salvi, Supriya Kaustubh & Surpum, Snehaprabha & Albanese, Emiliano & Zanwar, Preeti Pushpalata, 2026. "Assessing multilevel association of genderism on cognitive health of older adults across mesosystems and microsystems using the longitudinal aging study in India: An adaptation of the ecological systems theory and cumulative disadvantage/advantage fr," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002613
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626002613
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:401:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.