Author
Listed:
- McCann, Sarah
- Vehar, Linda
- Dunne, Simon
Abstract
Lung Cancer (LC) has a high amount of stigma attached to it due to its association with cigarette smoking. Individuals with LC often experience externalised stigma from others and internalised stigma such as feelings of shame, guilt, regret and self-blame. This can have serious negative effects on an individual's psychological wellbeing. The current review aimed to systematically examine the factors associated with perceived stigma in lung cancer and how such stigma is measured. Four databases were searched with no restrictions on dates. Studies were included if they used validated measures of perceived stigma and examined the association between LC stigma and at least one other factor. Thirty-four studies were included in the review and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Overall, the findings suggest that LC stigma is associated with a large number of demographic, clinical, psychological, behavioural and social factors, playing a significant role in the wellbeing of those with LC. People with LC have reported both internalised feelings of stigma such as shame and guilt, and externalised stigma such as perceived stigma from others. These results highlight the impact of LC stigma and have important implications for future research and practice. This includes the need for interventions targeted at individuals with LC and their healthcare providers to reduce the stigma associated with LC and mitigate the negative effects it can have on an individual's wellbeing. Additionally, public health campaigns are needed to educate people, create awareness about the causes of LC and increase empathy for those who have a LC diagnosis.
Suggested Citation
McCann, Sarah & Vehar, Linda & Dunne, Simon, 2026.
"A systematic review of the factors associated with lung cancer stigma,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003771
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119301
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.