IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v400y2026ics0277953626003680.html

Waste-ing antibiotics: Antimicrobial resistance, environmental pollution and unsettled science in the governance of pharmaceutical manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Lambert, Helen
  • Panwar, Amishi
  • Taneja, Neelam
  • Wellington, Elizabeth

Abstract

This paper analyses the role of scientific evidence in environmental health governance following recognition of the environment's role in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). It recounts events surrounding the Government of India's attempt to regulate antibiotic waste in the environment from pharmaceutical manufacturing in relation to a production site in north India where occupation, living conditions, and waste disposal practices drive unequal distributions of exposure. Drawing on qualitative findings from a research study (2020-2024) together with legal records and other secondary data, we analyse interpretations of scientific evidence among government regulators, civil society organisations, antibiotic manufacturers, scientists and judicial bodies to illustrate what happens when ‘unsettled’ science enters the public sphere. The ‘contradictory logics’ at play in attempts to regulate pharmaceutical pollution while enabling industrial production are identified and uses of evidence are shown to reflect stakeholders' social and economic interests, while polity and institutional structures shape approaches to environmental justice. The paper questions the centrality of scientific evidence in adjudicating threats of uncertain toxicity and suggests that scientific indeterminacy limits public engagement in environmental health protection. While antibiotic residues have been redefined as a form of hazardous waste, threshold paradigms which impose quantified limits to regulate emissions are poorly suited to the control of AMR.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambert, Helen & Panwar, Amishi & Taneja, Neelam & Wellington, Elizabeth, 2026. "Waste-ing antibiotics: Antimicrobial resistance, environmental pollution and unsettled science in the governance of pharmaceutical manufacturing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626003680
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.