IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v400y2026ics0277953626003424.html

Children’s participation and the logic of care: An analysis of narratives from Childhood-Haus professionals in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Schwenker, Rosemarie
  • Heringer-Seifert, Jana
  • Wulf, Dominik
  • Pütz, Edwin
  • Alayli, Adrienne
  • De Bock, Freia
  • Biermann-Teuscher, Dorit

Abstract

The Childhood-Haus (CH) concept in Germany, based on the Northern European Barnahus model, aims to provide child-friendly care and justice for children suspected of having experienced violence. A key element of the concept is the promotion of children’s rights, including the right to be heard and receive information (Barnahus Standard 1.2), also referred to as child participation. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted at three CHs and informed by Annemarie Mol’s concept of care, this article explores how participation is enacted by professionals—including pediatricians, police officers, psychologists, judges, and security staff. Analyzing professionals’ narratives, we show that participation is accomplished through their caring practices, which are attuned not only to children but also to other professionals and the atmosphere surrounding them. Professionals engage in careful experimenting and “tinkering,” in Mol’s sense, by sensitively attuning and responding to children while completing their formal duties, all of which is essential for enabling participation and realizing children’s rights. By foregrounding these caring practices, the article contributes to the development of the Barnahus model and its literature, offering a grounded and nuanced understanding of how Barnahus Standard 1.2 can be realized in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwenker, Rosemarie & Heringer-Seifert, Jana & Wulf, Dominik & Pütz, Edwin & Alayli, Adrienne & De Bock, Freia & Biermann-Teuscher, Dorit, 2026. "Children’s participation and the logic of care: An analysis of narratives from Childhood-Haus professionals in Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626003424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:400:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626003424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.