IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Urban-rural and regional differences in infant mortality in Taiwan

Listed author(s):
  • Knöbel, Harald H.
  • Yang, Wen-Shan
  • Ho, Mei-Shang
Registered author(s):

    We analyzed data from death certificates for all infant deaths in Taiwan from 1981 to 1988. During this 8-year period, the crude infant mortality rate decreased from 8.9 to 5.3 per 1000 live births. Deaths due to infectious diseases, which constituted a major fraction of this mortality, also declined from 3.4 to 1.2 per 1000 live births. While infant deaths due to nearly all causes declined, deaths due to injury and accidents rose from 0.62 to 0.71 per 1000 live births, and the sudden infant death rate rose form 0.13 to 0.46. Notable geographic differences included a high death rate in the small islands off the coast and in the eastern mountainous counties (9.1-11.2/1000 live births); this rate was twice that in Taipei (4.5/1000 live births). In addition, the level of urbanisation was also an important determinant of death rate; urban areas had much lower rates than rural areas. The highest rate (15.4) was persistently observed in the rural areas where the aboriginal tribes reside. This differential rate between urban and rural areas was most prominent for the vaccine-preventable diseases; the aboriginal areas had rates that were 12.9 times those in the cities. Moreover, since neonatal deaths are severely under-reported in Taiwan, especially in less urbanised areas, our data presumably underestimate the urban-rural health differences. Our findings identify high risk areas for various causes of infant death, and indicate that more targeted intervention such as improving education and health care as well as environmental hygiene in some specific areas may be warranted.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 39 (1994)
    Issue (Month): 6 (September)
    Pages: 815-822

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:6:p:815-822
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:6:p:815-822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.