IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of home-cased oral rehydration therapy in the Kingdom of Lesotho


  • Touchette, Paul
  • Douglass, Edward
  • Graeff, Judith
  • Monoang, Ivy
  • Mathe, Mannuku
  • Deke, Lisa Ware


Mothers in developing countries are being successfully taught to give an oral rehydration solution (ORS) at home. The quantity of oral rehydration fluid that mothers administer to their child remains a critical question. Inadequate quantities render oral rehydration therapy (ORT) ineffective. The primary focus of our investigation was direct measurement of the quantity of fluid unsupervised mothers gave their children at home. This study validates a methodology that provides precise information on ORS administration in the home, information essential for evaluating the effectiveness of home-based therapy and for planning programmes to influence unsupervised mothers to correctly administer ORS to their sick children. This study, conducted in the Kingdom of Lesotho, assessed the impact on home care of the national control of diarrhoeal disease (CDD) programme. Direct observations in the home established each child's status and the quantity of fluid used 24 hr after children left the ORT unit where mothers were instructed to give ORS at home. Data were gathered on natural consequences that might discourage use of ORS, such as vomiting, increased frequency of watery stools and distaste for the solution. The health status of most of the 197 children followed improved. The average volume of ORS administered was 544 ml. A full liter was given by 21% of the mothers. Only 3% of the mothers gave no ORS. The average dose was 65 ml/kg. Younger children got about the same volume as older children; thus, they received a higher ml/kg dose. Mothers gave more ORS to children who had more symptoms of diarrhoeal disease at the time they were brought to the clinic. Mothers who said that their child liked the taste of ORS gave more than those who reported that their children did not like the taste. There was no relationship between loose stool frequency reported by mothers and quantity of ORS given. Interviewers were able to obtain acceptable volume estimates from mothers by identifying the container used to administer ORS in the home and asking how often it was filled. Using this approach, 81% of the mothers accurately recalled how much ORS they had administered. This technique may make it possible to obtain accurate estimates of quantities of supplementary liquids such as juice, tea and soup given in the home.

Suggested Citation

  • Touchette, Paul & Douglass, Edward & Graeff, Judith & Monoang, Ivy & Mathe, Mannuku & Deke, Lisa Ware, 1994. "An analysis of home-cased oral rehydration therapy in the Kingdom of Lesotho," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 425-432, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:3:p:425-432

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Halkos, George, 1993. "Economic incentives for optimal sulphur abatement in Europe," MPRA Paper 33705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ger Klaassen & David Pearce, 1995. "Introduction," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, pages 85-93.
    3. Michael Grossman, 1972. "The Demand for Health: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number gros72-1, January.
    4. Tietenberg, T H, 1990. "Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, Spring.
    5. Halkos, George E., 1993. "Sulphur abatement policy: Implications of cost differentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 1035-1043, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:3:p:425-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.