IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v39y1994i3p407-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disadvantage in physically disabled adults: An assessment of the causation and selection hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Shaar, K. H.
  • McCarthy, M.
  • Meshefedjian, G.

Abstract

An area survey of West Beirut provided the oppurtunity to study whether disadvantage among people with physical disabilities is attributed to social class of origin (causation) or is due to the social consequences of disability (selection and drift). Adults who were disabled from poliomyelitis in childhood were compared to West Beirut residents and to age and sex matched sibling controls. The typical finding of a substantially greater proportion of disabled people in the lower social class groups was noted. Their fathers were also over-represented in the lower social classes but to a lesser extent in the skilled manual group. The occupational mobility processes, both inter-generational and intra-generational, pointed to a trend towards skilled labor for disabled groups from all social classes, a finding different from the general population trends. Selection (failure to reach or keep expected position) was noted in the lower social classes while the downward drift (movement from higher to lower social class) for the disabled persons was seen in the upper social classes. Both the causation and the selection-drift hypotheses were supported by the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaar, K. H. & McCarthy, M. & Meshefedjian, G., 1994. "Disadvantage in physically disabled adults: An assessment of the causation and selection hypotheses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 407-413, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:3:p:407-413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90138-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:3:p:407-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.