IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v398y2026ics0277953626002479.html

Digital mindfulness and the laboring self: A discourse analysis of burnout in Headspace

Author

Listed:
  • Jaumier, Eloïse

Abstract

Burnout has become a prevalent topic in both medical and public discourse, yet there remains little consensus on how it should be defined or addressed. Digital mental health technologies, especially mindfulness meditation apps like Headspace, position themselves as accessible responses to this condition. However, research in medical anthropology demonstrate that such technologies do not merely reflect dominant understandings of health, they actively shape health, illness/disease and care practices. Focusing on the mindfulness meditation mobile phone application Headspace, this article shows how the app reframes health as a moral obligation, equating well-being with productivity and “fitness for work.” Based on an ethnographic discourse analysis of Headspace's burnout-related content, the analysis demonstrates how burnout is constructed as an individual moral failing, entailing techniques of self-optimization aimed at restoring productive capacity. This study contributes to medical anthropology and digital health studies by revealing how mobile mental health apps encode neoliberal ideals of responsibility, productivity, and affective control into everyday self-care practices. In doing so, it expands critical scholarship on burnout by showing how digital technologies transform subjective experiences of exhaustion into sites of moral evaluation, underscoring the need for closer attention to how digital health platforms shape imaginaries of health, wellbeing, and subjectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaumier, Eloïse, 2026. "Digital mindfulness and the laboring self: A discourse analysis of burnout in Headspace," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002479
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626002479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.