IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v398y2026ics0277953626002376.html

Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Lynn

Abstract

Protest suicides often trigger similar acts, which complicate suicide prevention efforts during political crises. While contagion is frequently attributed to imitation following exposure, public perception and response remain poorly understood. Examining the lived experiences of exposure to protest suicides can illuminate how individuals react to these events, why they react as they do, and where they derive resilience. This study investigates exposure to protest suicide during Hong Kong's Anti-Extradition Bill movement in 2019 and uses in-depth interviews to explore why suicide did not spread beyond the first few cases. Participants perceived these suicides as understandable, yet not as political acts they would imitate. Five sociopolitical determinants – socio-political conditions, social media, leaderless movement dynamics, collective emotions and protester agency – shaped their responses. Understanding these factors and their interaction highlights risk and protective mechanisms to inform strength-based, culturally sensitive suicide prevention strategies in politically volatile contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Lynn, 2026. "Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002376
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626002376
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626002376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.