IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v398y2026ics0277953626001565.html

Social value of a childhood QALY - Revealed preferences from pharmaceutical funding decisions in Australia 2005–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jing Jing
  • Mortimer, Duncan
  • Harris, Anthony
  • Lancsar, Emily
  • Raghunandan, Rakhee
  • Sia, Kah-Ling
  • Huxley, Nicola
  • Picton, Leonie
  • Ayati, Nayyereh
  • Yong, Karen
  • Petrou, Stavros
  • Howell, Martin
  • Sellars, Marcus
  • Huynh, Elisabeth
  • Donaldson, Cam
  • Howard, Kirsten

Abstract

Several countries now formally include at least one aspect of equity, alongside cost-effectiveness, in health technology assessment (HTA) decisions, often focusing on need. Recent literature suggests public support for prioritising health gains for children over adults. While some agencies may indirectly consider age, none explicitly apply different weights to health gains for children.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jing Jing & Mortimer, Duncan & Harris, Anthony & Lancsar, Emily & Raghunandan, Rakhee & Sia, Kah-Ling & Huxley, Nicola & Picton, Leonie & Ayati, Nayyereh & Yong, Karen & Petrou, Stavros & Howell, , 2026. "Social value of a childhood QALY - Revealed preferences from pharmaceutical funding decisions in Australia 2005–2023," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001565
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626001565
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:398:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.