IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v393y2026ics0277953626001073.html

Risk adjustment to improve fairness and efficiency of resource allocation: a case from the Emilia Romagna region in the decentralized Italian SSN

Author

Listed:
  • Henriquez, Josefa
  • Fiorentini, Gianluca
  • Paolucci, Francesco

Abstract

Resource allocation formulas in National Health Systems (NHS) are crucial for distributing central funds to Regions/Local Health Authorities. However, under prospective capitation funding, resource constraints may generate incentives for selective rationing, as providers seek to contain costs within fixed budgets. While NHS features such as geographically based enrolment and funding limit explicit risk selection seen in competitive insurance markets, resource scarcity can lead to rationing in socially suboptimal ways, which might disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. This paper aims to quantify selective rationing incentives using the healthcare system in the Emilia-Romagna Region in Italy as a case study. We evaluate the current funding formula used in Italy and its impact on the Region and demonstrate how alternative formulas can be developed to minimize incentives for selective rationing in the Region while remaining feasible to implement, given heterogeneous data quality and availability across Regions that hinder formula development at a national level. Our results show that the current formula undercompensates specific population groups defined by age and sex and has inadequate responsiveness to need. Alternative formulas that risk-adjust using socioeconomic variables have low statistical fit but reduce funding disparities among deprived areas/poorer individuals. Nevertheless, they are less responsive to high-need individuals. Moreover, morbidity data, even at coarse granularity, contribute to more adequately funding high-cost groups like cancer patients. To explore broader implications, we simulate how these alternative formulas would alter allocations if applied at the national level, showing that accounting for risk variation would channel more resources to the Regions in need. Overall, we provide a rationale for transitioning from the current resource allocation formula to risk adjustment to reduce potential selective rationing incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Henriquez, Josefa & Fiorentini, Gianluca & Paolucci, Francesco, 2026. "Risk adjustment to improve fairness and efficiency of resource allocation: a case from the Emilia Romagna region in the decentralized Italian SSN," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001073
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626001073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.