IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v393y2026ics0277953626000997.html

Religiosity and justification of euthanasia: multilevel moderation of beliefs in life after death

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Bruno Frutuoso
  • Carvalho, Helena

Abstract

Although research consistently shows that both individual and national religiosity are negatively associated with the justification of euthanasia, there is a lack of knowledge about the moderators of this relationship. Beliefs in life after death provide a framework for attributing meaning beyond earthly existence. Using data from the most recent wave of the European Values Study project (EVS, 2022), this study examined how such beliefs in life after death relate to the justification of euthanasia and moderate the religiosity-euthanasia relationship at both individual and cultural levels in a cross-national context. A multilevel analysis of 35 countries and approximately 48,000 participants revealed that both religiosity and beliefs in life after death significantly increased opposition to euthanasia. Moreover, beliefs in life after death strengthened the negative association between religiosity and the justification of euthanasia. Findings suggest that these beliefs in life after death operate simultaneously at the individual and cultural levels. These results highlight the importance of multilevel approaches to understanding end-of-life attitudes and underscore the need for public health policies to consider cultural beliefs about death when addressing euthanasia legislation and clinical decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Bruno Frutuoso & Carvalho, Helena, 2026. "Religiosity and justification of euthanasia: multilevel moderation of beliefs in life after death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626000997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626000997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626000997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.