Author
Listed:
- Hu, Chengxi
- Qi, Yiqiao
- Wang, Wenfei Winnie
- Yan, Wei
- Peng, Kaiping
Abstract
Adolescent depression is a major public health concern involving well-documented gender differences that may vary across cultural contexts. In China's academically intensive educational environment, questions regarding when depression risk peaks across adolescence, how behavioral and social factors relate to depression differentially by gender, and how risks cluster into distinct vulnerability profiles remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a nationwide survey of 414,175 Chinese adolescents. We used generalized additive models and latent profile analysis to examine gender-differentiated age patterns and behavioral–social risk configurations. Results showed that girls reported higher depression scores than boys. Age patterns differed by gender: girls exhibited persistently elevated depression between ages 14–18, whereas boys showed na less pronounced inverted U-shaped pattern with resurgence in late adolescence. Behavioral risks (substance use, screen time) were more strongly associated with depression among girls, whereas physical activity and perceived socioeconomic resources were stronger protective factors for girls. Latent profile analysis identified three subgroups—"Active Advantaged," "Inactive Disadvantaged," and "Screen-Dependent"—with girls in the Screen-Dependent profile (10 %; high screen time, low physical activity) showing markedly higher depression levels. The findings highlight the need for continuous mental health monitoring for girls throughout mid-to-late adolescence (ages 14–18), increased support for boys approaching late adolescence (ages 16–18), and targeted interventions addressing clustered risks in high-screen-use, low-activity subgroups.
Suggested Citation
Hu, Chengxi & Qi, Yiqiao & Wang, Wenfei Winnie & Yan, Wei & Peng, Kaiping, 2026.
"Who is most at risk, and when? Gender-differentiated patterns and risk heterogeneity of adolescent depression in China: Evidence from a large-scale national study,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626000134
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118938
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:393:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626000134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.