IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v390y2026ics0277953625011980.html

Dual scripts and incongruent innovation: implementing social technology in homecare services

Author

Listed:
  • Bavngaard, Martin Vinther
  • Lund, Anne
  • Rasmussen, Erik Børve

Abstract

Despite continuous policy efforts, implementing technology in healthcare services remains a precarious venture. This study reports from a collaborative research and development project in Norway that aimed to implement a social technology – Komp – in community homecare services. Originally designed for social contact in the family setting, the project repurposed Komp as a solution connecting homecare services to home-dwelling older adults for service provision. Using the concept of script, we apprehend Komp as dually scripted: aiming to be different solutions to different user groups. Drawing on 68 fieldwork sessions conducted over a two-year period and 16 semi-structured interviews across four homecare teams, we trace Komp's implementation towards a split position between implemented and not implemented. We unpack this position using the dual script concept, first by highlighting how Komp's original family script primed homecare professionals' de-inscription of its new service script. Second, we emphasise the project's failure to collaboratively construct the service script, which impeded implementation. Third, we showcase how opposition to Komp as a service solution arose during implementation because of the coexistence – and superimposition – of the two scripts. While these thematic emphases remain specific to this implementation process, our study offers empirical and theoretical insights on the movement of multi-purpose technologies into service contexts and co-creation projects as vehicles for service innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bavngaard, Martin Vinther & Lund, Anne & Rasmussen, Erik Børve, 2026. "Dual scripts and incongruent innovation: implementing social technology in homecare services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:390:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625011980
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625011980
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carboni, Chiara & Wehrens, Rik & van der Veen, Romke & de Bont, Antoinette, 2022. "Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni N. Enero & Joan P. Bacarisas, 2025. "Digital Application Skills and Documentation Skills among Nurses in a Private Hospitals in Ormoc City," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(3), pages 1-38, March.
    2. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Chamakiotis, Petros & Russell, Emma & Charlwood, Andy, 2025. "Resistance, tensions and consent to digital working in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    3. Johnson, Belinda & Shakes, Pieta & Maylea, Chris, 2024. "Prenatal testing technologies in Australia: Unintended clinical and emotional complexities in underprepared systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    4. Ghis Malfilatre, Marie & Louvel, Séverine, 2025. "A medical profession towards empowerment? The uncertain future of digitalization in private general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    5. Kusta, Olsi & Bearman, Margaret & Gorur, Radhika & Risør, Torsten & Brodersen, John Brandt & Hoeyer, Klaus, 2024. "Speed, accuracy, and efficiency: The promises and practices of digitization in pathology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:390:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625011980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.