IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i5p725-731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A measure of family disruption for use in chickenpox and other childhood illnesses

Author

Listed:
  • McKenna, Stephen P.
  • Hunt, Sonja M.

Abstract

A search of the literature showed the lack of a suitable measure for assessing the impact of minor illness on children and their families. Such illness can lead to considerable disruption within the family and particularly to the parent primarily responsible for the care of the ill child. Discussion groups were run with parents who had a child who had had chickenpox within the previous 6 months. Analysis of the transcripts from the groups produced items indicating three types of disruption; parents' distress, changes in the behaviour of the ill child and general disruption to family arrangements. Items from the transcripts were formed into a questionnaire which was then used in a study of 61 families in which a child had become ill with chickenpox within the previous 7 days. The principal carer completed the measure every evening for a fortnight. The results of the study showed considerable disruption over the first few days of the child's illness, followed by a steady reduction over the whole 2-week period. Reliability and sensitivity analyses on the data set led to a final instrument with 25 items. This set of questions had high reliability and sensitivity and did not contain any chickenpox specific items. Consequently, the final measure could be used when studying any minor childhood illness.

Suggested Citation

  • McKenna, Stephen P. & Hunt, Sonja M., 1994. "A measure of family disruption for use in chickenpox and other childhood illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 725-731, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:5:p:725-731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90463-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:5:p:725-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.