IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i4p575-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlations between education and arthritis in the 1971-1975 NHANES I

Author

Listed:
  • Leigh, J. Paul
  • Fries, James F.

Abstract

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I, 1971-1975 (NHANES I) were used to analyze associations among highest education level and arthritis. The dependent variables indicated whether the respondent had ever been diagnosed with any form of arthritis by a physician (10,678 women and 7243 men) or whether physician X-ray readings suggested arthritis of the knee (3491 women and 3119 men). These variables did not distinguish between osteo- and rheumatoid arthritis. It is likely that the great majority of the sample reporting or diagnosed with arthritis had osteoarthritis. There were strong univariate correlations between answers to the general arthritis question and the knee question on the one hand and gender, age, body mass, schooling, income and employment on the other. Respondents' education level was found to be strongly and negatively associated with self-reported arthritis in the larger samples both before and after controls were entered for employment, income and potential biological risk factors. The association between self-reported arthritis or arthritis of the knees and education was weaker for men, but not for women after employment and income were accounted for. When body mass was accounted for, the association between self-reported arthritis or arthritis of the knees and education was weaker among women but not men. Long-run preventive strategies to combat osteoarthritis ought to consider investments in education.

Suggested Citation

  • Leigh, J. Paul & Fries, James F., 1994. "Correlations between education and arthritis in the 1971-1975 NHANES I," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 575-583, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:4:p:575-583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90254-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:4:p:575-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.