IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i3p483-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A strategy for trauma debriefing after railway suicides

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Chris
  • Miller, Joe
  • Watson, Gilli
  • Hunt, Nigel

Abstract

Following an increase in the incidence of railway suicide from an average of four events a year up to 1989 to 12 in 1990 an initiative was developed between the District Department of Clinical and Community Psychology, Exeter Health Authority and British Rail, Western Region. Traincrew leaders and management had become increasingly aware of the severity of the short- and long-term effects on drivers of experiencing a suicide. Although a management strategy had been developed over time to deal with what had been a rare phenomenon it was clear that such a dramatic increase in suicides warranted a more professional approach to debriefing and trauma counselling. This paper describes the strategies adopted by psychologists in developing an understanding of the stresses of experiencing suicides and other major incidents. The outcome of small group sessions with affected drivers is outlined. An account of the strategy developed through workshops with traincrew leaders is detailed and a three-stage debriefing (shock, search, adjustment) and follow-up protocol is discussed. This process is proposed for adoption as normal procedure following suicides or similar traumas for drivers and line managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Chris & Miller, Joe & Watson, Gilli & Hunt, Nigel, 1994. "A strategy for trauma debriefing after railway suicides," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 483-487, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:3:p:483-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90452-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    suicide railway debriefing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:3:p:483-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.