IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i2p363-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service attributes and the choice for STD health services in persons seeking a medical examination for an STD

Author

Listed:
  • Leenaars, P.E.M.
  • Rombouts, R.
  • Kok, G.

Abstract

This article examines choice for STD health services among patients suspecting a STD. A total of 825 patients who sought medical treatment at an STD clinic, a Family Planning Clinic or a General Practitioner participated in this study. Special STD clinics are not well known among patients visiting their GP or a Family Planning Clinic. Both perceived unprofessionality and embarrassment were reasons for not asking a GP for medical treatment and for not being loyal to their GP after a first visit. Most respondents evaluate the 16 service attributes as important and/or annoying. Differences in beliefs and evaluations about the separate service attributes existed between the three choice behavior groups. The results of this study may be useful in making persuasive arguments for the existence of special STD clinics, especially when competing for limited resources. However, attitudes to service attributes and social norms explained only 24% of the variance in scores between the three choice behavior groups. This means that other factors (have to) play a role in actual choice behavior. Future research should take into account factors, such as: personality traits, perceived behavioral control and confidentiality.

Suggested Citation

  • Leenaars, P.E.M. & Rombouts, R. & Kok, G., 1994. "Service attributes and the choice for STD health services in persons seeking a medical examination for an STD," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 363-371, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:2:p:363-371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90406-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:2:p:363-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.