Alternative forms of ambulatory care: Implications for patients and physicians
In recent years, new providers of ambulatory health care have appeared in the U.S. These providers are characterized by an emphasis on profit making, where the primary care giver, the physician, is often an employee, and where patients receive care in a non-traditional setting. Examples of these alternative providers include for-profit Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), freestanding ambulatory care centers (walk-in clinics), and outpatient surgery centers. These and other alternative suppliers of health care are of interest since they represent a new and growing form of health care delivery. For many patients, alternative providers of ambulatory care offer convenient, cost-effective medical service. However, the emphasis on profit which characterizes most of these providers may mean that rural, and inner city areas, as well as the poor and uninsured throughout the country, will not be able to take advantage of the convenience and savings these providers offer. For physicians, employment in an alternative ambulatory care system can be welcome as the costs of starting and operating a medical practice soar. Yet, physician-employees often face loss of autonomy, status and income. Authors point to the 'proletarianization' of physician-employees as they lose control over the location, means and direction of their work. This paper explores the development of alternative suppliers of health care. It focuses on three providers of alternative ambulatory care and the implications of these providers for both patients and physicians. Proposed directions for future research include obtaining data on the actual extent of alternative providers in the health care market and their effects on consumers and the deliverers of medical care.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 38 (1994)
Issue (Month): 2 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:2:p:275-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.