IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i10p1439-1447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social trajectories and diversity of careers: Two aspects of the evolution of the medical profession in France (1925-1989)

Author

Listed:
  • Bungener, Martine
  • Paicheler, Geneviève

Abstract

Over the last 50 years or so, the medical profession has undergone a profound transformation. In France, the boundaries of this period are marked by two decisive factors: - -construction of a system of collective funding of the services offered to the public by the medical profession; - -the need to control the increasing cost of medical services. At the same time, the adoption of an organized and permissive approach to funding has created a protected market and greater medicalization of the different strata of society through a specific process of professionalization of medicine. We point out the implications of these processes. It is assumed that public funding has extended the scope of liberal medical practice without physicians themselves being fully aware of the advantages and the resulting economic benefits it has brought them, i.e. its effects in terms of easier acquisition of wealth. These assumptions are based on two aspects of the data collected in the course of an extensive survey of 5491 retired French doctors: 1. 1. Analysis of data concerning the social origins and mobility of physicians. 2. 2. Analysis of the medical careers of physicians, diversification of professional orientation over time and physicians' incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bungener, Martine & Paicheler, Geneviève, 1994. "Social trajectories and diversity of careers: Two aspects of the evolution of the medical profession in France (1925-1989)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1439-1447, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:10:p:1439-1447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90282-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:10:p:1439-1447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.