IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i10p1325-1335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of HIV/AIDS on concepts relating to risk and culture within British community epidemiology: Candidates or targets for prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Frankenberg, Ronald J.

Abstract

The social and cultural responses to the AIDS/HIV epidemic focus attention both on the limitations of reification in biomedicine and on the deficiencies of many interpretations of culture in anthropology. Within clinical medicine the focus on disease and isolated aspects of the patient's somatic body alienates the patient's person, the body incarnate. AIDS/HIV infection reveals deficiencies in much epidemiological theorising insofar as it is merely regarded as either making possible or carrying out interventions on the health practice of individual others whether practitioners or patients. It also draws attention to the gap between the site of research and knowledge production about the abstract characteristics of populations and the application of this knowledge to the concrete reality of patients in the world. Reifications of culture by anthropologists themselves may confirm rather than weaken clinical reifications of disease and epidemiological reifications of risk group. Styles of epidemiology in Britain are examined in relation to anthropological writings to see the extent to which both need to overcome these practical and theoretical problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Frankenberg, Ronald J., 1994. "The impact of HIV/AIDS on concepts relating to risk and culture within British community epidemiology: Candidates or targets for prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1325-1335, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:10:p:1325-1335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90271-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:10:p:1325-1335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.