IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v385y2025ics0277953625008937.html

New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, Graham P.
  • Pralat, Robert
  • Waring, Justin
  • Peerally, M. Farhad

Abstract

Contemporary societal shifts are disrupting established professional divisions of labour in healthcare. Some have argued that professionalism itself is being transformed, with professions characterised less by claims to exclusive jurisdiction and more by connectivity and complementarity. This article puts these arguments to the test in a domain traditionally characterised as one of professional conflict: patient safety. Informed by the sociology of expertise, we consider the case of a new role—the patient safety specialist—constructed by some as a profession in the making. Drawing on three qualitative datasets comprising interview and focus group contributions from 71 participants, we find that patient safety specialists struggled to establish the legitimacy of their expertise in organisational environments that were often hostile. By forging alignments with the interests of clinical professionals, however, some advanced their roles in ways that served mutual interests, in line with recent theses on the changing nature of professionalism and the need for expertise that connects increasingly interdependent jurisdictions. The extent to which this advancement offered a solid and durable foundation for a claim to professional status, however, seemed more questionable.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, Graham P. & Pralat, Robert & Waring, Justin & Peerally, M. Farhad, 2025. "New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:385:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625008937
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:385:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625008937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.