IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v384y2025ics0277953625009104.html

The "natural" in the artificial: Surrogates’ reproductive literacy in navigating the health care system

Author

Listed:
  • Chorowicz Bar-Am, Orit

Abstract

This study examines how demographic changes among Israeli surrogates have transformed their approaches to medical authority and bodily autonomy within the surrogacy process. We explore the changing medical experiences of second-generation Israeli surrogates, marking a significant new trend that differs from earlier approaches. To this end, we conducted narrative interviews with 47 retired surrogates in Israel between July 2022 and March 2023, employing qualitative methodology and inductive thematic analysis. While first-generation surrogates typically embraced medicalization to create distance between themselves and the pregnancy, our findings demonstrate that contemporary surrogates actively integrate their natural reproductive capabilities into surrogacy protocols. This research suggests that demographic changes—from single mothers with lower socioeconomic status to predominantly middle-class, educated married women—have reshaped surrogate agency. Consequently, we introduce two key concepts: "repro-tech literacy," the specialized knowledge that surrogates acquire to navigate ART along with their embodied knowledge, and "hybrid model of reproduction," where surrogates strategically combine medical advancements with natural capabilities. Contemporary surrogates actively negotiate various medical aspects, including hormonal treatments, embryo transfers, and delivery methods, often challenging standardized protocols that they perceive as unnecessary for IVF patients without reproductive constraints. This research presents new theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of surrogate agency in reproductive medicine and challenge existing paradigms of medicalization in third-party reproduction. Our findings reflect a broader cultural shift toward selective medicalization and have practical implications for developing more ethical, patient-centered approaches to third-party reproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Chorowicz Bar-Am, Orit, 2025. "The "natural" in the artificial: Surrogates’ reproductive literacy in navigating the health care system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625009104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009104
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daphna Yeshua-Katz & Natalia Khvorostianov, 2021. "“Only My Husband and My Doctor Know. And You, Girls”: Online Discussions of Stigma Coping Strategies for Russian Surrogate Mothers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Hovav, April, 2020. "Cutting out the surrogate: Caesarean sections in the Mexican surrogacy industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Farah Nawabi & Franziska Krebs & Vera Vennedey & Arim Shukri & Laura Lorenz & Stephanie Stock, 2021. "Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Teman, Elly, 2008. "The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1104-1112, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hovav, April, 2020. "Cutting out the surrogate: Caesarean sections in the Mexican surrogacy industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Julia von Sommoggy & Eva-Maria Grepmeier & Janina Curbach, 2022. "Health Literacy-Sensitive Counselling on Early Childhood Allergy Prevention: Results of a Qualitative Study on German Midwives’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Trine Damsted Rasmussen & Helle Johnsen & Signe Smith Jervelund & Ulla Christensen & Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen & Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, 2021. "Implementation, Mechanisms and Context of the MAMAACT Intervention to Reduce Ethnic and Social Disparity in Stillbirth and Infant Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Maiken Meldgaard & Rikke Damkjær Maimburg & Maiken Fabricius Damm & Anna Aaby & Anna Peeters & Helle Terkildsen Maindal, 2022. "The Health Literacy in Pregnancy (HeLP) Program Study Protocol: Development of an Antenatal Care Intervention Using the Ophelia Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Farah Nawabi & Franziska Krebs & Laura Lorenz & Arim Shukri & Adrienne Alayli & Stephanie Stock, 2022. "Health Literacy among Pregnant Women in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Dorit Segal-Engelchin & Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari, 2023. "Editorial: Health and Well-Being Related to New Family Forms: Perspectives of Adults, Couples, Children, and Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-8, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625009104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.