IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v383y2025ics0277953625008111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring social influences on healthcare user decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Nouwens, S.P.H.
  • Veldwijk, J.
  • Pilli, L.
  • de Bekker-Grob, E.W.

Abstract

Commonly used choice models in healthcare assume that decision-making is an individualistic process, while other individuals or groups (i.e., influencers) can in fact impact decision-making. The purpose of this study is to examine different ways in which influencers affect healthcare user decision-making as an important step towards improving these choice models in healthcare. Two focus groups (n = 12) and 41 semi-structured interviews were conducted, within a range of healthcare domains: influenza vaccination, birth care, joint replacement and prostate cancer treatment domains. Both healthcare users and physicians were interviewed. Participants were recruited through collaborations with a GP, hospital and a research panel. Data were analyzed with a grounded theory approach. Results reveal three main elements of decision-making which were affected by different social influence mechanisms. In the information-gathering phase the perception of alternatives, attribute levels and risks was influenced by information retrieved from someone in the social network, others' experiences, and social norms. In the preference formation phase, the relative importance of attributes and the value of alternatives were impacted by social norms, advice, and consideration of an influencer's stake in the decision. Finally, the process of actual decision-making could be more deliberation-based or intuition-based through discussion with or consultation of others. The exact strength and impact of these influences differed per healthcare domain. This study provides further insights into social influences on healthcare user decision-making across multiple healthcare domains and provides comparisons between these domains. Several connections between influencers, social influence mechanisms and choice constructs were identified. These findings can help choice modelers develop models that more accurately reflect the decision-making process in health.

Suggested Citation

  • Nouwens, S.P.H. & Veldwijk, J. & Pilli, L. & de Bekker-Grob, E.W., 2025. "Exploring social influences on healthcare user decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625008111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625008111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.