Author
Listed:
- Han, Sae Hwang
- Burr, Jeffrey A.
- Zhang, Shiyang
Abstract
Despite the burgeoning literature linking prosocial helping behaviors and cognitive function, empirical evidence on whether transitions into and out of helping roles—and how dynamic changes in time commitment—shape cognitive outcomes remain limited. Moreover, most research has focused on formal volunteering, leaving the cognitive outcomes associated with informal helping—assistance provided directly to non-household individuals—largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate the linkages between two forms of helping behaviors—formal volunteering and informal helping—and late-life cognitive function, focusing on dynamic changes in these behaviors over time. Drawing on the life course perspective and two decades of longitudinal data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (1998–2020; N = 31,303), we employed the asymmetric fixed-effects modeling approach within a multilevel framework to assess how intra-individual changes in helper role status and time commitment shape cognitive function trajectories. Results indicated that transitioning into volunteering and informal helping were both associated with a higher level of cognitive function and a slower cognitive decline, and highlighted how sustained engagement in helping can yield cumulative cognitive benefits that progressively become greater over time. The findings also provide unique evidence on the level of time commitment in helping behaviors needed to achieve cognitive benefits, where moderate levels of helping (approximately 2–4 weekly hours) were consistently linked to robust cognitive benefits for both forms of helping. These findings highlight prosocial helping behaviors as impactful, modifiable lifestyle interventions for promoting cognitive health in aging populations.
Suggested Citation
Han, Sae Hwang & Burr, Jeffrey A. & Zhang, Shiyang, 2025.
"Helping behaviors and cognitive function in later life: The impact of dynamic role transitions and dose changes,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007968
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118465
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.