IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v383y2025ics0277953625007737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex-selective abortion bans and the birth outcomes of Asian immigrants

Author

Listed:
  • Zang, Emma
  • Okura, Keitaro
  • Tian, Melissa

Abstract

The pro-life movement in the United States has achieved significant legislative victories in restricting abortion access. Among these, sex-selective abortion bans (SSABs)—prohibitions on abortions sought based on fetal sex—have garnered little scholarly attention. Advocates of SSABs often invoke xenophobic stereotypes, claiming that Asian immigrants hold a cultural preference for sons and engage in sex-selective abortions of female fetuses. This study examines the impact of SSABs on Asian immigrant mothers’ birth outcomes, hypothesizing that these laws foster a stigmatizing social climate that exacerbates maternal stress and adversely affects infant health. Using natality data from the National Vital Statistics System (2005–2019) and a triple-difference approach, we find that SSABs significantly increased the likelihood of low birth weight and preterm births among infants born to Asian immigrant mothers. These findings highlight the broader health consequences of policies rooted in xenophobia, underscoring the need for nuanced policy discussions surrounding abortion access, anti-Asian hate, and immigrant well-being in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Zang, Emma & Okura, Keitaro & Tian, Melissa, 2025. "Sex-selective abortion bans and the birth outcomes of Asian immigrants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007737
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007737
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.